Fact Pattern
A
purchases a ticket to watch a Major League Soccer game live, at a stadium in
her home town. A has front row seats for the game, just behind one of the two
goals. During the game, the best and most powerful striker on the field, B,
takes a shot towards the opposing team’s goal. This goal happens to be the goal
behind which A is watching the game from a short distance away. The ball,
traveling at 70 miles per hour, misses the goal and hits A in the head. A loses
consciousness and collapses, striking her head on the concrete stadium floor and
suffering a serious concussion. A concussion is a traumatic brain injury that
causes a temporary loss of neurological function and may, in some cases, cause
death.
A is
immediately rushed to the emergency room in an ambulance. Because A is in
critical condition, the ambulance drives at high speeds towards the emergency
room, running red lights and speeding through busy intersections. When the
ambulance arrives at the hospital, the emergency medical technicians (EMTs)
rush to unload A from the ambulance. During the unloading process, one of the
EMTs slips and drops A on the floor. Assume that the EMT’s actions amount to
simple negligence, but not gross negligence.
Due to
the drop, A hits her head on the concrete floor, causing a “second impact
syndrome.” This is a fatal swelling of the brain, which can occur if a
concussion victim suffers a second head trauma too soon after the trauma that
initially caused a concussion. A dies.
Assume the prosecution could prove the above facts at B’s trial for
homicide.
Questions
Applying common-law rules, did B cause A’s
death? Explain, focusing solely on the
issue of causation, but do not
analyze B’s ultimate liability for homicide.
Question 1
Applying common-law rules, did B cause A’s
death? Explain, focusing solely on the
issue of causation, but do not
analyze B’s ultimate liability for homicide.